About Me

Name: Maudie in Mandeville
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Maudie's 'Homosxual Arab linguists'

According to Sen. B. Hussein Obama, speaking to reporters after the Thursday night Democratic homosxual forum in Los Angeles sponsored by Human Rights Campaign, a homosxual advocacy group, and Logo, the gay and lesbian cable network, said he would press the Joint Chiefs of Staff "to call for an end to...'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'" Obama mentioned that the law has cost the military Arabic linguists at a time when they are desperately needed.

Who knew that so many homosxuals spoke Arabic...or was he saying so many Arabs are homosxual?  All the more reason to keep them out of our military.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Giuliani's Five-Star Conservative Judicial Advisory Panel

As the Democrat Congress continues to outspend and out earmark the previous Republican one (you really thought they wouldn't?), the only result from those brilliant conservatives/libertarians who sat out the '06 election "to teach them a lesson" was to make it more difficult for a third Bush appointee to the Supreme Court.  Social conservatives should be educating their followers on the type of person a President Giuliani or Romney would nominate vis a vis a feminist driven Hillary.

Giuliani has appointed his Five-Star Conservative Judicial Advisory Panel whose function is to advise him of conservative candidates for the Court.  Whatever you think of his past actions, a Hillary or Obama presidency will have no such panel influencing their decision, unless you include the ACLU, Moonbat.Org and the North American Man-Boy Love Assn.

They would do well to keep Senator Schumer's comments in mind, who said the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”   At least two appointments will be made in the next few years that will decide the ideology of the court for the next 25.  A 'living-breathing whatever we say it means' Court, or a Court of Judicial Restraint.  Without the courts, liberals would not have infested America with their favorite Euro-Stalin programs for the last 50 years.  

Golda Meier, a former Prime Minister of Israel once said there would never be peace in the Middle East until Arab mothers learned to love their children more than they hated the Jews.  Forty years later, we're still waiting for muslim mothers to show that love.  One might say that social conservatives will never leave their children a better America
until they can discern the difference between Hillary's appointees with their ACLU, Heather Has Two Mommies, Little Johnny  suspended for Hate Crime of praying over his bag lunch in the school cafeteria, feminist agenda to eradicate our moral foundations, and Giuliani's Five-Star Conservative Judicial Advisory Panel with its possible shortcomings.  

Social conservative leaders like James Dobson of Focus on the Family and D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries types should be huddling with the Giuliani, Romney, et al, camps, letting them know they will get out the vote for the nominee...one time.  After that, his reelection support, even his nomination will be contingent upon his Antonin Scalia type appointment(s) to the Court.  America doesn't have another 40 years.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Whatever happened to Cal Thomas?'

After Cal Thomas intro's his 7/3/2007 column with his drive through Indiana to a family reunion, the rest of it reads like it had been written by Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney, or Herman Goering.

He first disparages talk radio, apparently jealous that he's not Rush. Cal agrees with Barack Obama, who tells us, "that religion is not the exclusive property of conservative Christians."  B. Hussein Obama certainly should know. Formerly a muslim, he still probably hasn't found any reference to 72 virgins in his new Bible.  As for Conservative vs liberal Christians, while religion is not exclusive to any one group, each may have its own 'exclusive property' of beliefs.  Obama's United Church of Christ worships with openly ho mosexual bishops and condones that lifestyle, along with some Episcopal Churches. Those two and other liberal denominations promote abortion.  Even within the Catholic Church you have what the Pope says regarding abortion, and then you have the 'Kennedy Catholics for Choice'.  Religion is a set of beliefs. Conservative Christians have exclusive property to theirs that liberals reject (the 10 Commandments), and liberal Christians have exclusive property to those that Conservative Christians reject (abortion, the ho mosexual agenda, radical feminism, etc.).

Cal piles on in his next paragraph.  He asserts that not only can't conservative Christians claim the religious mantle, "Neither is patriotism a trademark of the Republican Party."  This brought back memories of all those 'patriots' in San Francisco carrying placards as the Iraq War began, one reading 'We support the troops when they shoot their officers'.  He writes "As with religion, some people on the right have used patriotism, which should be a unifying theme, to divide Americans."  Harry, Nancy, Ted, Hillary, et al, just bring tears to Maudie's eyes in their attempts to unify Americans.  "My liberal friends love America as much as I do."  Uh, Cal, I think they spell it with a 'k'.

Cal notes that "when American "boys" went off to war, they had total support from family, friends, neighbors..."  No word from Cal on total support from politicians and the news media these days.  Cal also needs to reread his history book.  Herman Goering's quote that "All you have to do is to tell (the country) they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism" was actually utilized by the Third Reich when they staged a Polish invasion into Germany, then declared war on a hapless Poland.  Unless Cal subscribes to the "George Bush did it" crowd from the likes of Rosie O'Donnel, America actually was attacked on 9/11 by an enemy.  If he's not a member of Kooksville, what exactly was his point?

"And still we love America for opportunities that do not exist in such proportion in any other nation."  And why don't they exist in other nations, Cal?  It is those same liberals and the opposing party that supports and encourages and appoints Supreme Court Justices who yearn for European law (or Zimbabwean, ala Justice Breyer) which has limited or crushed those same opportunities which Cal loves.  One might ask Cal which party supports and encourages and celebrates the rubrics which have given Americans those opportunities, from a reverence of our Founding Fathers and our Constitution as written (not the living breathing Zimbabwean one), to the capitalist, free enterprise system.  As for ridiculing G.K. Chesterton's statement 'My country, right or wrong', it was spoken in general terms, not specifically to every bill before Congress, stains on a purple dress, or cheering a returning war vet telling stories (and I really mean 'telling stories') of rape, cut off heads and ears, taped wires on genitals, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, and all the rest that the liberals accuse their beloved America of doing every day.  

The patriotic Chesterton knew that his beloved country was morally good, indeed, morally superior to most other nations throughout his world.  Alas, Christian Conservatives may lament how that morality has deteriorated since Chesterton spoke those words, as socialism, atheism, United Church of Christ Christianity, and liberal policies have eroded some of those morals in America, just as Chesteron would certainly be appalled at Britain's drift. The only comfort, if we are keeping score, is that Europe and the rest of the world had a head start.

We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

Patriotism never changes, Cal.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Vote for me, I’m holier than my opponent'

"Oh, girl, did you see him on TV with his wife along side him? Don't you just know he's a hypocrite, uh huh. I still have an old campaign brochure of his and he's got his family with him there on the front cover, all smiles and all. Don't you know he let us all down, girl? He's a hypocrite, that's what he be."

Are you one of those that sent Vitter to Congress because he had a nice looking family on his campaign brochure? Are you breathlessly following this story (hoping to get a look at the call girl he boinked)?  There seem to be alot of you out there, especially among conservative Christians (a distinction Maudie makes given the pro-abortion United Church of Christ, the pro-homo-sexual agenda of the Episcopal Church, and the assorted Reverends Barry Lynn, Sharpton, Jackson, et al, who get down on their knees every night and give thanks for Larry Flynt).

Maudie's having a tough time accepting 'hypocrite' as the best word to describe Vitter, or any politician in a related situation. A politician doesn’t campaign with the slogan, “Vote for me, I’m holier than my opponent.” If his issues were ‘family values’ and his American Conservative Union ranking is ‘94’ and a ‘100’ from the Family Research Council, his voting record still stands in favor of traditional families no matter his personal moral failings, or are you one of those who didn’t think they had them?

Politicians are our lackeys, the dogs that do our bidding. At the end of their term, we judge them on how well they yea'd and nea'd, then we vote accordingly. Vitter has voted pro-life, pro family with no equivocation. Unless Louisiana can come up with a candidate in the primary that is more conservative and holier than Vitter, your judgment should be made on how he voted, not on what he said or did or how pretty his family is on the campaign brochure.

“I’ll take a Republican ‘hypocrite’ for 100, Alex.”
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Latin Mass

Re: the Holy Father's directive establishing the right of any Priest to celebrate the Tridentine Latin Mass; I've written to 4 of the largest churches in the area but have had only one response. As appreciated as it was, the good Father said that " The pronouncement just came down the wire. We haven’t received any directives from the Archbishop regarding his intentions. This may take some time."

Given that it had only been a week, Father probably hadn't read many of the details, the most obvious being that any Priest wishing to celebrate the Latin Mass doesn't need the Bishop's permission. That's how the Holy Father has circumvented the liberal Bishops circumvention of Pope John Paul II's
motu proprio Ecclesia Dei in 1988 (first authorized in the letter Quattuor abhinc annos of the Congregation for Divine Worship, dated October 3, 1984).

Pope John Paul II called on the Bishops to make "a wide and generous application" of the Tridentine  Mass available. Some might question Maudie's use of the word liberal to describe the Bishops. What word would you use to describe them after 23 years of having ignored the Holy Father's directive, having eradicated the Latin Tridentine Mass even though no where in Vatican II does it call for eliminating it, and grudgingly interpreting "wide and generous" as 300 miles or more to the nearest service? Maudie is one of the luckier ones, having only to drive 130 miles round trip to
Baton Rouge (and don't be late for the 9:30 service, or you'll have to wait until next week).

The dioceses have until September 14 and then by Pope Benedict's edict, the Latin Mass may be celebrated by any Priest. What are the odds that these same liberal Bishops, who despise the traditional celebration, and who've implanted Protestant-like rubrics into the Holy Mass, have Priests trained in the Latin Tridentine Mass? What are the odds young Priests will stand up to their Bishop? What are the odds of retribution from their Bishop for any Priest brave enough to celebrate the Latin Mass?

Maudie isn't holding our breath.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Allow cockfighting in abortion clinics

It seems Louisiana is the only state which still allows cockfighting, the betting sport whereby razors are strapped to each coc.k, then the two combatants are thrown into a ring and go at it until only one is left standing.  Louisiana's answer to banning the sport is to announce that its ban will start...sometime in the future (so get off our backs).

Maudie has a simple solution.  Allow cockfighting only in abortion clinics.  A 'cockfight' of sorts would ensue between Planned Parenthood in support of this new money-maker and the pro-abortion membership of PETA against the barbarity of killing innocent chickens.  Maudie can just imagine used fetal vacuum bags being thrown around the abortion room as these two former allies fight the new Pro-life/Pro-Choice battle of our time.

update:  Let's get cockfighting out of the depravity of the backwoods, and bring it into the comfort of a 21st century abortion clinic!  It's about time!! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Sometimes it's good to be an assshole'

So a punk kidnaps and murders someones child.  Find him and allow the father his justice.  A battery charger, vise grips, a skinning knife, and a smile,...the smile hurts the worst.

The perpetrator weeps and begs.  It's the smile.  Sometimes it's good to be an assshole.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Swiss suicide

Swiss suicide clinics 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Why muslims have many children'

From the Associated Press:  "Federal authorities announced Saturday they had broken up a suspected Muslim terrorist cell planning a "chilling" attack to destroy JFK Airport..."

Cair, the pro-muslim organisation founded in America, funded from Saudi Arabia and pro-terrorist groups, denounced the AP story.  Ibrahim Hooper, spokes-imam for Cair, stated that "No muslim would ever, EV-VERRR, plan to destroy anything American and never has.  We love America.  We are Americans first and muslim wackjobs before that.  We love to hate America."

Hooper went on to say that "The story is false and is perpetrated by Zionist American supporters of Israeli terrorism.  These are the same Zionists who work to subvert our efforts in sending our children into Israeli pizza parlors with suicide belts strapped around their little waists.  Praise be to allahaha that we have so many children.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Dr Dobson's 20/200 vision'

Given the working relationship between Family Research Council and Focus on the Family, it might behoove Tony Perkins to put a bug in Dr Dobson's ear regarding his comments on the Republican presidential candidates. If they confuse Maudie, they probably confuse others.

Dr. Dobson has stated that he assumed Fred Thompson was not a Christian. Something as critical as getting a conservative elected to appoint hopefully conservative jurists to the Supreme Court should have inspired Dr Dobson to pick up the phone and ask Fred.  This has all been 'clarified' according to Focus, but damage done.

Dr. Dobson has stated he will not vote for Giuliani because of his socially liberal life choices and positions. Giuliani has stated he will appoint strict constructionists to the Supreme Court.  Pray tell why Dr. Dobson can accept Fred's apparent first time acknowledgment that he is a "believer", but apparently does not accept Giuliani's pronouncement of appointing conservative jurists.  Dr. Dobson should realize groups like FOF and FRC could have held Giuliani's feet to the fire once elected and even now, could have held talks with him to get him to define 'strict constructionist' and gotten some examples of who would fall into this category, even offering their own prospects.  Now, it must be assured, FOF has little influence in the Giuliani camp.

Dr. Dobson should have known that appointing strict constructionists would have all but removed Giuliani's position on abortion as a relevant issue. Lawrence Tribe, Alan Dershowitz, et al, have described Roe as bad law.  Notwithstanding stare decisis, overturning Roe would give Rudy one vote to decide abortion in his home state of New York only. Rudy certainly hasn’t articulated this fact well, but if Dr. Dobson can accept Gingrich’s mea culpa’s, he should have done the Christian conservative movement a favor and helped Rudy with this message. After all, hundreds of thousands of little Dr. Dobsons sitting out this next election, puts Hillary in…and there is no question what kind of judges she will appoint.

Primaries are supposed to be for voters to determine their choice to eventually run against their enemy.   This time should be spent by like- minded thinkers to mobilize support for their candidate.  Dr. Dobson hasn't officially chosen, instead spending his time cutting off his nose to spite his face.  His eventual selection may not become the voters choice.  Unless he truly believes that a candidate who will take the war to the muslim terrorists and will appoint strict constructionists to the Supreme Court, effectively neutering his socially liberal beliefs, is still worse than Hillary and all that she will bring to the Oval Office, he should keep his powder dry, his influence at the ready, and his mouth shut.  Pray for a conservative candidate, strict constructionist appointments, and for Dr. Dobson to see the light.

update 7/16/07: 
Giuliani to Reveal Five-Star Conservative Judicial Advisory Panel  But because of Dr. Dobson's short sightedness, as Maudie pointed out back in May, he probably won't be on the panel to make any influential contribution.  And we are the worse off because of it.  In his place, let's hope for Ann Coulter or Michael Savage.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Something strange about Rudy'

 There's something troubling about Rudy. We know he's pro-choice (but personally against it), he would appoint 'strict constructionists' to the Supreme Court, and doesn't believe there should be a litmus test on "Roe against Wade" (Rudy's qu.eer label for Roe v. Wade).

If Rudy gets the conservative Christian vote (pro-life), he wins. So why all this twisting and turning on the abortion issue? The more he is asked about abortion, the less genuine he sounds. It also seems to belie his trumpeting about no litmus test for overturning Roe. In Rudy's case, certainly not any litmus, but it seems there could be a "How important is stare decisis?" (respect for legal precedent) question. Rudy's pro-choice handlers could certainly come up with a list of 20 or 30 wannabe's who have proven that they would have upheld
Dred Scott. And is a 'strict constructionist' someone who would vote to overturn a law "the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found"? or that was simply "Heavy-handed judicial intervention"?,  or which "borders on the indefensible"?  Sound alot like Scalia, Thomas, and Alito? 

These and other quotes against the Roe decision come from liberals of the first order, from Lawrence Tribe to Alan Dershowitz.  If Roe is considered by legal scholars of all stripes to be a "lousy opinion that disenfranchised millions", what's Rudy's problem?  Strict constructionists would find Roe "not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be." 

If Rudy's silly handlers would have had him state that he will appoint strict constructionists and that based on even Lawrence Tribe and Alan Dershowitz type liberals, Roe is on shaky ground, it doesn't matter what a president's view on this issue is; he is only one vote in his home state once the law is overturned.  The fact is, Rudy is appealing to pro-choice voters.  So be it.
update 7/16/07:  Giuliani to Reveal Five-Star Conservative Judicial Advisory Panel
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Segelene was no Hillary...she shaved around her bikini bottoms'

Some conservatives are sounding the death knell for Hillary Rodman - Clinton, based on the defeat of socialist Segelene Royal in France.   Women in France abandoned Segelene and conservatives hope this is a foreteller of what will happen in America.   One word describes why they are premature in their forecast...hair.

Look at a
picture of Segelene and you see a Babe!  Thin, good looking, and no hair under her arms.  Socialist women in France could not identify.  In fact, they held it against her.  She wasn't one of them.  Word has it that Segelene even shaved around her bikini bottoms before she went to the beach.  If you've ever been to a French beach, you know there's nothing  more disgusting than looking at a dark clump hanging out both sides of a bikini bottom.

Conservatives, keep your powder dry.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McGreevey's Episcopal Church is relief valve for Catholics

While it is unclear at press time what the Episcopal Church had to offer former New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey in the first Protestant Church Draft Day, Maudie has confirmed from sources close to Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, (the Episcopal equivalent of NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell) that while McGreevey will not be the first openly homosexual to grace the pulpit of said Protestant denomination, he will, in fact be the first 'priest' ever to don a pink long gown with floral stretch lace complete with form fitting styling, sheer net flounce adorned with bow, adjustable straps with G-String and flowing open back. 

Within five years, his contract calls for being elevated to Bishop, becoming the second (known)  homosexual in the American Episcopal Church.  Bishop Jefferts Schori has described homosexuality as a gift from God.  Her plan may be to 'pack the pulpit' with God's gifts.  Word on the street is that only last minute enticements lured McGreevey away from a United Church of Christ semenary, oh sorry, seminary, which endorses same sex (that would in this case be man into man) marriage.

Catholics on the other hand may be breathing a sigh of relief.  The liberal Bishops who promoted the new feminized Church back in the 60's are now gone, but their 'offspring' control the Novus Ordo diocese.  After all the homosexual pedophilia law suits, even they may be chastened enough to appreciate this new found relief valve.  Episcopalians, guard your children well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Protestant suicide problem

In an earlier piece, Maudie included a chart from Gunowners of America showing the homicide and suicide rate of countries with high gun ownership including the U.S.  A quick glance shows the much higher incidence of suicide in many of these countries.  

Reuters has published an
article on attempts by socialists in Switzerland to introduce gun control legislation to reduce their high rate of
suicide.  The piece made some interesting points for a Second Amendment pro-life Tridentine Catholic.  First, that the suicide rate "may" include assisted suicide cases.  May?  It would seem pretty easy just to add them up, no?  But then a good Socialist isn't going to cast aside anything which would diminish his call for gun control nor jeopardize their own assisted suicide platform. 

Second,  Switzerland has become a destination point for individuals (or family members of same) wishing to use the 'expertise' of suicide-assistance groups for which the country "has built up some fame".  Wait until North Korea or Zimbabwe hear about this money maker!  They could share the facilities of the embryonic stem cell research factory.  But back to the Swiss.

Reuters pays lip service with one short paragraph about the (most) "often-heard explanation" into the suicide rate, then flits back into their gun control mode never to mention it again.  And that would be "a link to religion, noting that Switzerland's predominantly Protestant areas have more suicides than Catholic cantons". 

What a condemnation of what is going on in these
churches.  As Maudie pointed out in a seminal piece, many mainline Protestant churches are either openly pro-abortion, or equivocate on the issue.  Few have been steadfast in their opposition like the Catholic Church and that opposition includes embryonic stem cell destruction and assisted suicide.  When life is so devalued by any religious denomination, it is not surprising that the 'spill-over' includes the lives of the parishioners themselves.   

So rather than sermonize about these evils, many Protestant (and liberalized Catholic congregations) hear DNC talking points.  Think this is an exaggeration?  Check out Howard Dean's and Barack Obama's United Church of Christ
web site.  On the day this column was published, UCC was featuring Barack Obama, Earth Day and environmental justice, articles on non-aggressive evangelism, and Christian-Muslim siblings denouncing U.S. militarism.  They also tell you that "The United Church of Christ seeks to be Multiracial, Multicultural, Open and Affirming, and Accessible to All".  One wonders why a church would have to include this tag line.    

As
evidenced by the fact that Swiss Catholics have a much less proclivity toward suicide compared to their Protestant counterparts, it's obvious the problem isn't guns, it's liberalized religion.  The facts suggest that when Catholics are down and out, they turn to God; when UCC type Protestants are down and out, they turn to Gaia or Dr. Phil, then to suicide. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maudie's 'Women and children used the Oakland bridge'

The fiery crash of a gasoline tanker truck melted a bridge in Oakland.  So far, no one is calling for an investigation into the destruction.  I note this only because Rosie O'Donnell says fire can't melt steel. 

Why would Bush want to destroy the Oakland bridge, other than the obvious?  Women, children, and minorities (and lesbians) used it.  With Rosie now canned from 'The View', progressives will now have to go back to MoveOn.org or CNN for their hate America news.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive